Sunday, September 29, 2013

A520.5.3.RB - Shuck, Allison

Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea

In the article “Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea”, Russ Forrester explanations six reasons why so many organizations today fail to effetely empower their employees; Those reasons are: (1) Precipitous empowerment mandates, (2) Over reliance on a narrow psychological concept, (3) One-size-fits-all, (4) Negligence of the needs of power sharers, (5) A piece-meal approach and, (6) distortions of accountability.

Of the six reasons, I personally think that precipitous empowerment mandate and one-size-fits all, are typical among most organizations. The old switcheroo act happens all the time, where employees who are promised higher positions of power but never receive them; only to find out that the position had been given to someone else within their department. For some reason, many organizations today choose to only promote those who they deem worthy rather than those who are actually qualified. This kind of fast-track empowerment gives employees a false since of hope and explains why so many employees lack motivation.

The concept one-size-fits-all is somewhat relative in that it implies that employees are all the same and that the approach used to empower an employee is also the same. According to Forrester (2000), such deployment of empowerment is destructive and guarantees failure. Making assumptions is one thing, but assuming that most decisions have the same requirements and/ or that the person of power who makes such executive decisions can easily be replaced is outlandish. Although, this non-selective approach to decision making is professional and curious, it is not common within most organizations and one should not assume that just anyone will do.  That is not to say that we should be biased against anyone, but it takes years or experience to be a leader. Thus, most organizations “resist delegating authority to employees who are not ready to handle it, or who don’t, for their own reasons, want to” (Forrester, 2000, Pg. 70).

No comments:

Post a Comment